N=1 After 40

Completed experiment

Tadalafil

A low-dose blood-flow test ended when a repeatable lower-body ache began disrupting sleep. The symptom pattern resolved after stopping. Personal experiment record, not medical advice, prescribing, sourcing guidance, or an instruction to copy.

Outcome: I tried a daily low dose for blood flow and longevity, timed around training. Within a few days I developed a recognized, dose-related muscle ache that was worse lying down and started cutting my sleep short. I isolated the cause to tadalafil and stopped. Filed as a stopped experiment.

Research Summary

What it is

Tadalafil is a long-acting PDE5 inhibitor, the same drug class as sildenafil but with a roughly 17.5-hour half-life, which is why it is the one used for daily low-dose protocols. The framing I was responding to is well-known: Bryan Johnson has said he takes 2.5 mg daily for longevity rather than erections, and on Andrew Huberman's show a low daily dose is discussed as something most men over 40 might consider for blood flow. Both are clear that this is personal practice, not a doctor prescribing for me.

Why I tried it

Two goals. First, general longevity and better blood flow, to see whether I could feel anything. Second, blood flow during weight training, which is why I timed the dose about two hours before lifting, trying to land near peak absorption.

The pre-workout timing, examined

For a single dose the timing is reasonable: peak plasma is around two hours, and unlike sildenafil, food does not blunt it. Two things undercut it for me. First, on a daily dose the drug accumulates to a flat steady state within about five days, so the previous days' doses are still working, and timing today's tablet two hours before the gym is essentially cosmetic once you are dosing every day. Second, the training benefit I was timing for is not well supported: the most on-point human trial gave healthy athletes tadalafil at 20 mg, eight times my dose, and found no change in VO2max or aerobic and anaerobic thresholds. The cleaner "restores muscle blood flow" data come from boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, where the nitric-oxide signaling pathway is broken; relieving that is a disease-model rescue, not evidence that healthy muscle gets extra flow. The popular "tadalafil pre-workout for pumps" idea is an extrapolation from that mechanism, carried mostly by telehealth marketing rather than any trial showing it works.

The side effect

The ache I felt is a recognized, dose-related effect, not a fluke. The prescribing information describes "diffuse bilateral lower lumbar, gluteal, thigh, or thoracolumbar muscular discomfort," typically starting 12 to 24 hours after a dose, and on a daily dose it builds with accumulation, which fits why it showed up on day three or four rather than day one. Here is the part that stopped me: the single most specific thing I felt, that the ache was worst lying down, is not a quirk of mine. It is written into the official prescribing information, which says the discomfort is "exacerbated by recumbency." The pain eased when I moved, returned when I sat, and was worst in bed, exactly as described. Patients in a Mayo Clinic forum thread describe the same signature, worst at rest and easing within a day or two of stopping.

Mechanism, still unsettled

The popular explanation is off-target inhibition of PDE11: tadalafil is only about 40-fold selective for its target over PDE11, versus roughly 1,000-fold for sildenafil and 9,300-fold for vardenafil, which fits why this ache tracks with tadalafil specifically. But that story has a real hole, because one tissue study found PDE11 protein is not detectable in human skeletal muscle. The more mundane alternative is plain vasodilation, more blood flow and mild fluid shift in muscle and paraspinal tissue, which would also explain why it is worse lying still. Diagnostic workups in the original trials found no actual muscle damage. The honest summary is a recognized effect with a genuinely unsettled mechanism.

Does the body adapt?

A common piece of advice is to push through for a week or two until it fades. It often does fade in reports, but no study proves the side effect actually desensitizes. And adapting to a side effect is not the same as the underlying perturbation stopping; it mostly means I stop noticing something that is still happening to my muscles. That is not the same as the cause going away, and it is not a trade I wanted to make for an optional compound.

Every other day

The other suggestion is intermittent dosing. The math is not simply half the benefit: about 38 percent of a dose remains at 24 hours and 15 percent at 48 hours, so levels swing more but never fully clear. The vascular benefit also splits in two, an acute part, blood flow while the drug is present, which off-days sacrifice, and a slower endothelial part. There is one small study where alternate-day tadalafil improved and sustained endothelial function, but it used 20 mg in higher-risk men and a surrogate marker, and nothing tests intermittent 2.5 mg. For my training goal specifically, the off-day is exactly when the acute effect is gone.

The longevity premise

The harder question is whether the benefit is even worth chasing. The mortality and longevity signals for tadalafil are all observational and heavily confounded, because men who fill and refill these prescriptions tend to be healthier and more active to begin with, and the large drug-repurposing screens are explicitly correlative. The one rigorous randomized trial on a tissue-protection endpoint, in Duchenne muscular dystrophy, was negative. So the longevity case is a plausible hypothesis, not an established benefit, which sets a low ceiling on how much side-effect cost it justifies.

Safety boundary

Tadalafil is a prescription medication with real interactions, most importantly with nitrates and alpha-blockers, and it is not a supplement. This page documents one person's short experiment and decision. It is not a protocol, a dose to copy, or sourcing guidance.

Sources

The Experiment

Protocol

I started at 5 mg on the first day, only because that was the pill size I had. After that I split tablets down to a 2.5 mg daily microdose and took it about two hours before training. A pill splitter is not a precise way to halve a tablet, but the dose was close enough for what I was testing.

First impression

Day one felt like being back in my twenties, down to the random daytime erections I had forgotten about. It was genuinely fun for a day, and it also told me quickly that I did not actually want that as a permanent background state. That reframed the experiment around the longevity and blood-flow goals rather than the obvious one.

When it went wrong

By the third or fourth day I had a constant deep ache through my glutes, legs, and calves, closer to the dull, restricted-blood-flow feeling you get from sitting wrong on a large vessel than to normal training soreness. It did not stop me lifting or moving, but it was always there, easing a little with movement and coming back hard when I sat or lay down. Lying in bed was the worst of it, and it started cutting my sleep short. I was waking early just to get out of bed and away from the pain, which is exactly the recovery I am training to protect.

The confound

I had changed two things at once. The same day I started tadalafil, I also raised my tesamorelin from a previous 500 mcg per day to 2 mg per day. Both high-dose tesamorelin and tadalafil list muscle pain as a side effect, so on paper either could have been the cause.

Isolating the cause

I stopped both for two days and the pain went away completely. Then I restarted tesamorelin alone, at the same 2 mg, and the pain did not come back. That left tadalafil as the cause, consistent with having used tesamorelin before without this problem, and with the specific worse-lying-down pattern pointing squarely at tadalafil.

Decision

I stopped tadalafil. The version I tested, daily and timed around training, failed on its own terms: the pre-workout rationale does not hold up at steady state, the training benefit is unproven, and the longevity benefit is real but unproven, which is not enough to justify losing sleep. I am already at the lowest standard dose, so there is little room to simply go lower. The only thing I might revisit later is low-frequency dosing aimed purely at the vascular question, going in with eyes open that it is unproven and may simply hurt again. Not the daily, training-timed protocol that put me here.